Sequenced DNA comparison, |
||||
 |
without DNA sequence disclosure. |
|||
| robots |
🢩 A Compliance Imperative 🢨 |
|||
Patents: GRANTED |
||||
Offering: Licences with know-how, training & reference code. |
||||
As per ftc.gov verifiably An official website of the United States government
The FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
PROTECTING AMERICAS CONSUMERS
…take the privacy of DNA very seriously.
"...for consumers to realize benefits from DNA-based products or services, consumers need to be able to…and trust that the company’s practices related to the DNA of privacy (data minimization, purpose limitations, retention limits, etc.) will protect the privacy of their DNA."
As Undisclosed DNA achieves minimization by not keeping a copy of the DNA sequence, nor needing the provider to have ever held a copy of the DNA sequence itself, for it's use, yet realising the benefits achieved, via the DNAddress & DNA cryptography, how long will it be until use of Undisclosed DNA become a regulatory requirement ?
"Protecting biometric information – including genetic data – is a top FTC priority."
"FTC has settled actions against two sellers of direct-to-consumer DNA testing kits."
"The consequences for ignoring these warnings can be significant. In both recent genetic testing matters, the companies ended up paying substantial financial settlements, either as civil penalties under California state law (CRI Genetics) or for consumers redress (Vitagene). Furthermore..."
